Second and later-line erlotinib use in non-small cell lung cancer: real world outcomes and practice patterns overtime in Canada

Published: September 13, 2021
Category: Bibliography
Authors: Craig C. Earle, Kirstin Perdrizet, Natasha B. Leighl, Ning Liu, Qing Li, Rinku Sutradhar
Countries: Canada
Language: English
Types: Care coordination, chronic condition, Population Health
Settings: Health Plan



In Canada, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were initially approved regardless of EGFR status. The purpose of this study is to characterise the use of second or later-line erlotinib therapy in Ontario, Canada from 2007–2016, as well as evaluate the impact of erlotinib therapy on survival and emergency department (ED) visits in a real-world population.


This is a retrospective cohort study derived at ICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences) of advanced NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2007–2016 in Ontario, Canada, over the age of 65, who received at least one dose of first-line chemotherapy. The exposure of interest was receipt of second or later-line erlotinib. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio for mortality evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model, and the secondary outcome, ED visits, was evaluated using a Poisson model.


First-line chemotherapy was administered in 30.4% of stage IV NSCLC patients. Of these patients, 19.7% received second or later-line erlotinib. The proportion of patients prescribed second or later-line erlotinib decreased over the course of the study (P<0.0001). Unadjusted median overall survival in the entire cohort was 325 days (95% CI: 314–337 days), 513 days (95% CI: 485–539 days) in the erlotinib cohort, and 282 days (95% CI: 270–291 days) in the non-erlotinib cohort. Despite this, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.89 (95% CI: 1.73–2.07, P<0.0001) for patients on erlotinib. Patients receiving erlotinib also had a marginally higher relative rates of ED visits with an adjusted relative risk of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02–1.19, P=0.013).


This study highlights the importance of using EGFR targeted treatments in NSCLC patients with a predictive biomarker, and suggests that treatment with erlotinib therapy is unlikely to benefit unselected patients with advanced NSCLC.

Lung cancer,biomarkers,erlotinib,real-world data

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top