What, if anything, does amenable mortality tell us about regional health system performance?

Published: February 1, 2013
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Lavergne MR, McGrail K
Countries: Canada
Language: null
Types: Performance Analysis
Settings: Hospital

Healthc Policy 8:79-90.

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Amenable mortality is proposed as a health system performance measure, and has been used in comparisons across countries and socio-economic strata. We assess its utility as a health region–level indicator in Canada.

APPROACH: We classified all deaths in British Columbia from 2002 to 2009 using two common definitions of amenable mortality. Counts and standardized rates were calculated for 16 health regions. To assess reliability, sensitivity and validity, we compared rates across regions and over time, and examined correlations with premature and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS: Of the 238,849 deaths in the study period, 6.6% or 13.7% were classified as amenable (depending on the definition used). Rates were stable or falling in more populated regions, but unstable with large confidence intervals elsewhere. Correlation with overall mortality was strong.

CONCLUSION: Though amenable mortality is appealing as a feasible, understandable indicator, we question whether it is appropriate for comparisons at a subprovincial level.

Comment in Amenable (or avoidable) mortality as an indicator of health system effectiveness. [Healthc Policy. 2014]

PMID: 23968629
PMCID: PMC3999562

Mortality Prediction,Performance Analysis,Sensitivity,Canada,Adolescent,Adult,Age Factors,British Columbia/epidemiology,Cause of Death,Gender,Middle Aged,Quality Indicators,Regional Medical Programs/statistics & numerical data

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top