Short-run associations between medical care expenditures and adherence to clinical practice guideline-based measures for diabetes

Published: November 1, 2000
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Azzolini J, Marder WD, Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S
Countries: United States
Language: null
Types: Care Management
Settings: Hospital

Value Health 3 Suppl 1:29-38.

MEDSTAT Group, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, USA

OBJECTIVES: To estimate relationships between medical care expenditures in 1996 and adherence to seven guideline-based measures for diabetes.

METHODS AND DATA: Nonlinear exponential regression analyses were used to estimate relationships between medical care expenditures in 1996 and adherence to guideline-based measures that year, adjusting for differences in patients’ demographics, location, plan type, and severity of illness. Adherence to criteria regarding physician visits, eye exams, blood sugar tests, urinalysis, triglyceride tests, total cholesterol tests, and HDL cholesterol tests was studied for 18,403 patients in 35 health plans.

RESULTS: Average total medical expenditures would be $713 higher if all patients were treated according to the guideline-based measures in 1996, compared to what expenditures would be if no patients were treated that way. Average diabetes-related expenditures would be about $322 higher. Two important exceptions to this pattern were for adherence to the suggested frequency of hemoglobin A1c blood sugar tests and ophthalmology visits for dilated eye exams. Having the recommended number of these tests was associated with significantly lower total expenditures.

CONCLUSIONS: In general, adherence to clinical practice guideline-based measures was more costly than deviating from those criteria, in the short-run. Perhaps expenditures should be higher for many patients who are not treated according to guidelines. Randomized studies with more years of follow-up should be conducted to assess whether short-term investments in guideline adherence pay off with lower medical expenditures and greater levels of health in the long term.

Comment in Introduction to diabetes special issue of value in health. [Value Health. 2000]

Introduction to diabetes special issue of value in health.Kind P. Value Health. 2000 Nov-Dec; 3 Suppl 1:1-2.

PMID: 16464207

Resource Use,High-Impact Chronic Conditions,Cost Burden evaluation,United States,Databases,Factual,Diabetes Mellitus/classification,Diabetes Mellitus/therapy,Gender,Health Care Costs/classification,Quality Indicators,Health Care/standards,Quality Indicators,Health Care/statistics & numerical data,Regression Analysis,Severity of Illness Index

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top