Self-referral in point-of-service health plans

Published: May 1, 2001
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Forrest CB, Fowles J, Frick KD, Lemke KW, Starfield B, Vogeli C, Weiner JP
Countries: United States
Language: null
Types: Care Management
Settings: Academic, Hospital

JAMA 285:2223-2231.

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA

CONTEXT: Most health maintenance organizations offer products with loosened restrictions on patients’ access to specialty care. One such product is the point-of-service (POS) plan, which combines “gatekeeping” arrangements with the ability to self-refer at increased out-of-pocket costs. Few data are available from formal evaluations of this new type of plan.

OBJECTIVES: To comprehensively describe the self-referral process in POS plans by quantifying rates of self-referral, identifying patients most likely to self-refer, characterizing patients’ reasons for self-referral, and assessing satisfaction with specialty care.

DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis using administrative databases composed of members aged 0 to 64 years who were enrolled in 3 POS health plans in the Midwest (n = 265 843), Northeast (n = 80 292), and mid-Atlantic (n = 39 888) regions for 6 to 12 months in 1996, and a 1997 telephone survey of specialty care users (n = 606) in the midwestern plan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-referred service use and charges, reasons for self-referral, and satisfaction with specialty care.

RESULTS: Overall, 8.8% of enrollees in the midwestern POS plan, 16.7% in the northeastern plan, and 17.3% in the mid-Atlantic plan self-referred for at least 1 physician or nonphysician clinician visit. The proportions of enrollees self-referring to generalists (4.7%-8.5%) were slightly higher than the proportions self-referring to specialists (3.7%-7.2%) across all 3 plans. Nine percent to 16% of total charges were due to self-referral. The chances of self-referral to a specialist were increased for patients with chronic and orthopedic conditions, higher cost sharing for physician-approved services, and less continuity with their regular physician. Patients who self-referred to specialists preferred to access specialty care directly (38%), reported relationship problems with their regular physicians (28%), had an ongoing relationship with a specialist (23%), were confused about insurance rules (8%), and did not have a regular physician (3%). Compared with those referred to specialists by a physician, patients who self-referred were more satisfied with the specialty care they received.

CONCLUSIONS: Having the option to self-refer is enough for most POS plan enrollees; 93% to 96% of enrollees did not exercise their POS option to obtain specialty care via self-referral during a 1-year interval. The potential downside of uncoordinated, self-referred service use in POS health plans is limited and counterbalanced by higher patient satisfaction with specialist services.

Comment in JAMA. 2001 Aug 8;286(6):672-3.

PMID: 11325324

Practice Patterns Comparison,Specialists,Medical Conditions,United States,Adolescent,Adult,Aged,Algorithms,Child,Preschool,Economics,Medical,Fee Schedules,Health Care Surveys,Health Maintenance Organizations/economics,Infant,Gender,Medicine/standards,Middle Aged,Patient Satisfactions/statistics & numerical data,Referral and Consultation/economics,Retrospective Studies,Specialization

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top