DOCUMENTS

papers

Risk adjustment using administrative data-based and survey-derived methods for explaining physician utilization

Published: February 1, 2010
Category: Papers
Authors: Agha MM, Glazier RH, Moineddin R, Sibley LM
Country: Canada
Language: null
Type: Care Management
Setting: Academic

Med Care 48:175-182.

Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate an administrative data-based risk adjustment method for predicting physician utilization and the contribution of survey-derived indicators of health status. The results of this study will support the use of administrative data for planning, reimbursement, and assessing equity of physician utilization.

METHODS: The Ontario portion of the 2000-2001 Canadian Community Health Survey was linked with administrative physician claims data from 2002-2003 and 2003-2004. Explanatory models of family physician (FP) and specialist physician (SP) utilization were run using demographic information and The Johns Hopkins University Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) Case-mix System. Survey-based measures of health status were then added to the models. The coefficient of determination, R, indicated the models’ explanatory power.

RESULTS: The study sample consisted of 25,558 individuals aged 20 to 79 years representing approximately 7.8 million people. Over the 2 years of study period, 82.5% of the study population had a FP visit with a median of 6 visits and 53.2% had a SP visit with a median of 1 visit. The R values based on administrative data alone were 33% and 21% for the frequency of FP and SP visits and 16% and 35% for having one or more visit to an FPs and SPs, respectively. The addition of the survey-based measures to the administrative data-based models produced less than a 2% increase in explanatory power for any outcome.

CONCLUSION: Administrative data-based measures of morbidity burden are valid and useful indicators of future physician utilization. The survey-derived measures used in this study did not contribute significantly to models on the basis of administrative data-based measures. These findings support the future use of administrative data-based data and Adjusted Clinical Groups for planning, reimbursement, and research.

PMID:19927013

Resource Utilization,Practice Patterns Comparison,High Risk,Adult,Aged,Gender,Forecasting,Health Care Rationing,Health Services Research/methods,Health Services Research/statistics & numerical data,Logistic Models,Middle Aged,Morbidity,Ontario/epidemiology,Prospective Studies

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top