Comparative analysis of outcome measures used in examining neurodevelopmental effects of early childhood anesthesia exposure

Published: June 1, 2014
Category: Bibliography > Papers
Authors: Brady JE, Davidson AJ, DiMaggio CJ, Feng T, Hegarty MK, Ing CH, Li G, Malacova E, Sun LS, Von Ungern-Sternberg BS, Wall MM, Whitehouse AJ, Wood AJ
Countries: Australia
Language: null
Types: Population Health
Settings: Hospital, PCP

Anesthesiology 120:1319-1332.

Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA; Murdoch Childrens Research Institute and Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Symphony Capital LLC, New York, NY, USA

INTRODUCTION: Immature animals exposed to anesthesia display apoptotic neurodegeneration and neurobehavioral deficits. The safety of anesthetic agents in children has been evaluated using a variety of neurodevelopmental outcome measures with varied results.

METHODS: The authors used data from the Western Australian Pregnancy Cohort (Raine) Study to examine the association between exposure to anesthesia in children younger than 3 yr of age and three types of outcomes at age of 10 yr: neuropsychological testing, International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification-coded clinical disorders, and academic achievement. The authors’ primary analysis was restricted to children with data for all outcomes and covariates from the total cohort of 2,868 children born from 1989 to 1992. The authors used a modified multivariable Poisson regression model to determine the adjusted association of anesthesia exposure with outcomes.

RESULTS: Of 781 children studied, 112 had anesthesia exposure. The incidence of deficit ranged from 5.1 to 7.8% in neuropsychological tests, 14.6 to 29.5% in International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification-coded outcomes, and 4.2 to 11.8% in academic achievement tests. Compared with unexposed peers, exposed children had an increased risk of deficit in neuropsychological language assessments (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Total Score: adjusted risk ratio, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.41 to 4.33, Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Receptive Language Score: adjusted risk ratio, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.19 to 4.18, and Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals Expressive Language Score: adjusted risk ratio, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.08 to 3.68) and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification-coded language and cognitive disorders (adjusted risk ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.18 to 2.10), but not academic achievement scores.

CONCLUSIONS: When assessing cognition in children with early exposure to anesthesia, the results may depend on the outcome measure used. Neuropsychological and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification-coded clinical outcomes showed an increased risk of deficit in exposed children compared with that in unexposed children, whereas academic achievement scores did not. This may explain some of the variation in the literature and underscores the importance of the outcome measures when interpreting studies of cognitive function.

Comment in
Early childhood anesthetic neurotoxicity and unmeasured covariates: there’s the RUB. [Anesthesiology. 2015]
In reply. [Anesthesiology. 2015]
Anesthetic-related neurotoxicity in the young and outcome measures: the devil is in the details. [Anesthesiology. 2014]

PMID: 24694922

Predictive Risk Models,Outcome Measures,Age,Medications,Adolescent,Age Factors,Child, Child Behavior Disorders/diagnosis,Child Behavior Disorders/epidemiology,Child Behavior Disorders/psychology,Preschool,Cohort Studies,Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology,Developmental Disabilities/psychology,Gender,Follow-Up Studies,Infant,Pregnancy,Prospective Studies,Western Australia/epidemiology,Young Adult

Please log in/register to access.

Log in/Register

LinkedIn Facebook Twitter

© The Johns Hopkins University, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Health System.
All rights reserved. Terms of Use Privacy Statement

Back to top